Microsoft Surface Pro 4 test

· · Mobilno · Stranica 3 od 4

Rezultati testova

PCMark 8

PCMark 8 Asus G751JY4.621,0Dell Precision M68004.293,0Acer Travelmate P645-S3.051,0Asus X550JK3.026,0Dell Inspiron 35432.987,0Acer Aspire V132.869,0Acer Aspire R132.708,0Microsoft Surface 4 Pro2.706,0Dell Latitude E52502.679,0Dell Latitude E34502.634,0Dell Inspiron 57492.457,0Dell Inspiron 31482.432,0Dell Inspiron 35422.270,0Acer Switch 121.757,005.083

Sasvim prosječne Conventional performanse se znatno podižu Accelerated testom kada rezultat skače na 3257.

3DMark

3DMark Fire StrikeHP Elitebook 2570p – R9 270X eGPU5.772,0Dell Precision M6800 – M61003.332,0Asus X550JK – GTX 850M2.944,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – GTX 750M1.817,0Dell Inspiron 3543 – GT 840M1.612,0Microsoft Surface 4 Pro – Iris HD5401.366,0Dell Inspiron 3542 – GT 820M843,0Acer Aspire V13 – HD5500822,0Acer Travelmate P645-S – HD 5500787,0Acer Aspire R13 – HD5500756,0Dell Latitude E3450 – HD5500712,0Dell Latitude E5250 – HD4400584,0Dell Inspiron 5749 – HD5500530,0Dell Inspiron 3148 – HD 4400493,0Acer Aspire Switch 12 – HD 5300366,006.349

Iris 540 ovdje pokazuje zube i izvlači vrlo dobra rezultat u 3DMarku koji ne zaostaje puno iza GT 840M rješenja od Nvidie. No, igranje bilo koje igre u vrlo visokoj rezoluciji koju Surfaceov ekran ima bi se moglo pokazati malo problematično.

Cinebench 15

Cinebench 15 – cpuDell Precision M6800 – i7 4810MQ686,0Asus G751JY – i7 4860HQ663,0Microsoft Surface 4 Pro – i7 6650U330,0Asus X550JK – i5 4200H325,0Acer Aspire V13 – i7 5500U300,0Dell Inspiron 3543 – i5 5200U282,0Acer Aspire R13 – i7 5500U278,0Acer Travelmate P645 – i5 5300U274,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – i7 4500U272,0Dell Latitude E5250 – i5 4310U260,0Dell Inspiron 3542 – i5 4210U259,0Dell Latitude E3450 – i5 5200U258,0Dell Inspiron 5749 – i3 5005U207,0Dell Inspiron 3148 – i3 4030U185,0Acer Aspire Switch 12 – Core M-5Y1083,00755

6650U predvodi poredak dvojezgrenih Intelovih procesora što je sasvim očekivano.

7-Zip

7zip – MIPSDell Precision M6800 – i7 4810MQ20.829,0Asus G751JY – i7 4860HQ20.453,0Microsoft Surface 4 Pro – i7 6650U9.738,0Acer Aspire V13 – i7 5500U8.373,0Acer Travelmate P645-s – i5 5300U8.177,0Asus X5510JK – i5 4200H8.120,0Acer Aspire R13 – i7 5500U8.089,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – i7 4500U8.085,0Dell Inspiron 3543 – i5 5200U8.060,0Dell Latitude E5250 – i5 4310U8.039,0Dell Inspiron 3542 – i5 4210U7.781,0Dell Latitude E3450 – i5 5200U7.705,0Dell Inspiron 5749 – i3 5005U6.084,0Dell Inspiron 3148 – i3 4030U5.625,0Acer Aspire Switch 12 – Core M-5Y102.500,0022.912

I u 7-Zipu je rezultat 6650U procesora odličan u odnosu na starije dvojezgrene modele. Naravno, prava bi usporedba bila direktno protiv i7 5650U modela no nešto malo viši Turbo takt i IPC povećanje koje Skylake donosi bi rezultirale s otprilike desetak posto prednosti.

ATTO Disk Benchmark

Atto – ReadMicrosoft Surface 4 Pro1.536,6Asus G751JY – SSD1.057,9Acer Travelmate P6450-S – SSD986,9Acer Aspire R13 – SSD515,0Acer Aspire Switch 12 – SSD501,7Dell Latitude E5250128,3Asus G751JY – HDD121,2Dell Inspiron 5749116,3Dell Precision M6800114,2Dell Latitude E3450113,0Acer Aspire V13109,8Dell Inspiron 3542108,8Dell Inspiron 3148108,6Asus X550JK107,5Dell Inspiron 3543101,7Dell inspiron 773798,901.690 Atto – WriteAcer Travelmate P645-S – SSD905,6Asus G751JY – SSD785,2Acer Aspire R13 – SSD410,6Microsoft Surface 4 Pro170,2Acer Aspire Switch 12131,2Asus G751JY – HDD119,9Dell Inspiron 3148111,0Dell Inspiron 3148110,5Dell Latitude E5250110,0Dell Precision M6800110,0Acer Aspire V13109,9Dell Latitude E3450108,1Dell Inspiron 3542107,8Asus X550JK103,6Dell Inspiron 574982,20996

Samsungov M.2 SSD () donosi odlične performanse čitanja no i dosta slabije performanse zapisa koje ipak na kraju neće previše utjecati na ukupne performanse i korisničko iskustvo.

AIDA64 Memory

Aida Memory – readAsus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L27.155,0Microsoft Surface 4 Pro – 2x 8GB DDR3L25.269,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L 160023.120,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L 160021.561,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L 160021.253,0Acer Aspire R13 – 2x4GB LPDDR3 160020.849,0Dell Latitude E3450 – 2x4GB DDR3L 160020.657,0Acer Travelmate P645-S – 2+4GB DDR3L18.812,0Acer Aspire Switch 12 – 2+2GB DDR3L17.567,0Dell Latitude E5250 – 8GB DDR3L 160012.157,0Dell Inspiron 3543 – 4GB DDR3L 160011.975,0Asus X550JK 4GB DDR3 160011.877,0Dell Inspiron 3542 4GB DDR3L 160011.869,0Dell Inspiron 3148 – 4GB DDR3L 160011.823,0Dell Inspiron 5749 4GB DDR3L 160010.711,0029.871 Aida Memory – writeMicrosoft Surface 4 Pro – 2x 8GB DDR3L39.165,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L24.970,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L 160024.893,0Acer Aspire R13 – 2x4GB LPDDR3 160024.770,0Dell Inspiron 7737 -2x8GB DDR3L 160024.606,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L 160023.573,0Dell Latitude E3450 – 2x4GB DDR3L 160023.813,0Acer Aspire Switch 12 – 2x2GB DDR3L22.143,0Acer Travelmate P645-S – 2+4GB DDR3L20.104,0Dell Latitude E5250 – 8GB DDR3L 160012.599,0Asus X550JK – 4GB DDR3L 160011.978,0Dell Inspiron 3543 – 4GB DDR3L 160011.991,0Dell Inspiron 3148 – 4GB DDR3L 160011.871,0Dell Inspiron 3542 – 4GB DDR3L 160011.176,0Dell Inspiron 5749 – 4GB DDR3L 160010.527,0043.082 Aida Memory – copyMicrosoft Surface 4 Pro – 2x 8GB DDR3L30.535,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L26.430,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L 160024.606,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L 160022.538,0Acer Aspire R13 2x4GB DDR3L 160021.873,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L 160021.193,0Dell Latitude E3450 – 2x4GB DDR3L 160021.168,0Acer Aspire Switch 12 – 2x2GB DDR3L19.215,0Acer Travelmate P645-S – 2+4GB DDR3L19.046,0Dell Latitude E5250 – 8GB DDR3L 160012.328,0Dell Inspiron 3542 – 4GB DDR3L 160011.896,0Dell Inspiron 3543 – 4GB DDR3L 160011.550,0Dell Inspiron 3148 – 4GB DDR3L 160011.463,0Asus X550JK 4GB DDR3L 160011.462,0Dell Inspiron 5749 – 4GB DDR3L 160010.119,0033.589

I dok su i performanse čitanja sasvim solidne, performanse zapisa i kopiranja su izvrsne. Kombinacija brzog DDR3L RAM-a u dvokanalnom režimu rada i Skylake artitekture donosi odličnu propusnost.

Autonomija

Trajanje baterije – 4K@60fps (MP4, H.264)Microsoft Surface 4 Pro202,00222

Kao što smo već tijekom testa napomenuli, autonomija će u “normalnom” uredskom radu s malo multimedije i surfanja internetom iznositi 5 – 6 sati što je sasvim solidan rezultat. Ukoliko pak pokrenemo 4K video u 60 fps-a kakav smo mi pokrenuli autonomija pada na dvadeset i dvije minute preko tri sata što je i dalje solidna vrijednost. Procesor se ovdje ipak ne “znoji” znatnije nego kod reprodukcije 1080p videa, pa je i na takvoj upotrebi očekivana autonomija vrlo slična.